研究目的
To evaluate the safety of high fluence LED-RL (≥160 J/cm2) on human skin.
研究成果
LED-RL is safe up to 320 J/cm2 for skin of color and 480 J/cm2 for non-Hispanic Caucasian individuals. LED-RL may exert differential cutaneous effects depending on race and ethnicity, with darker skin being more photosensitive. These findings may guide future studies to evaluate the efficacy of LED-RL for the treatment of various diseases.
研究不足
The true MTD may exist between 320 J/cm2 and 480 J/cm2 for skin of color and between 480 J/cm2 and 640 J/cm2 for non-Hispanic Caucasian skin. Another limitation is the single-center study design. Device limitations were also present as the LED output varied by up to 10% in power density.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
Two phase I, single-blind, dose escalation, randomized controlled trials were conducted. Healthy subjects received LED-RL or mock irradiation to the forearm thrice weekly for three weeks at various fluences.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Healthy subjects of any sex and age were recruited. Major exclusion criteria included diabetes, history of skin cancer, lupus, light-sensitive conditions, skin disease at the treatment site, and photosensitizing medications.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
The source of LED-RL was the Omnilux new-U handheld LED device. The mock therapy device was identical-appearing and temperature-matched.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Subjects were blinded to the treatment throughout the study. The treatment site was the non-dominant proximal volar forearm.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Summary statistics of AEs were recorded. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and t-test were used to compare the age and resolution of erythema between the LED-RL and mock procedures. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the frequency of a categorical variable between the LED-RL and mock procedures.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容