研究目的
To determine the differences in clinical outcome for hypertrophic scars treated with laser-assisted corticosteroid delivery, as compared to laser-assisted 5-fluorouracil delivery.
研究成果
Both laser-assisted triamcinolone acetonide and 5-fluorouracil delivery produced reductions in overall scar area with no statistically significant differences between the two modalities. However, 5-fluorouracil was associated with fewer adverse events, supporting its use in the management of traumatic scars by laser-assisted therapy.
研究不足
The study's limitations include a sample size of 20 individuals recruited from a single clinical site, which may affect the power of the findings. Future studies with more participants and combination treatments are suggested.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
A prospective, double-blinded, single-subject study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of fractional ablative laser-assisted delivery of either 50 mg/mL of 5-fluorouracil solution or 20 mg/mL of triamcinolone acetonide solution in the treatment of hypertrophic scars.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Adults aged 18 years and older with either 2 similar but separate scars or one large hypertrophic homogenous scar resulting from burns, surgical, or other traumatic injuries were included.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
A fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser (Lumenis UltraPulseTM) was used for treatment.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Treatment consisted of 3 sessions, spaced at 1-month intervals, with anesthesia applied before the procedure.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed using SPSS version 18.0 to compare the reduction of a scar’s area between the two treatment modalities.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容