研究目的
To examine comfortable indoor lighting conditions and gender differences in that determination using LED lights.
研究成果
No gender difference was found in the boundary illuminances estimated from psychological and physiological responses for LED lights. The high boundaries of LED lights were higher than those of fluorescent lights at all CCTs tested. The low boundary illuminances of LED lights at 3000 K and 4000 K were higher than those of fluorescent lights, but the low boundary illuminance at 5000 K was lower. These differences may be due to differing spectral distributions and luminances at a given illuminance between fluorescent and LED lights.
研究不足
The study's findings may only be applicable to LED lights with the specific spectral distributions described. The rapidly advancing development of LED lights could lead to changes in glare and blue light effects, potentially altering comfortable lighting conditions.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The experiment was carried out in a climatic chamber with LED lights installed on the ceiling at three CCT levels: 3,000, 4,000, and 5000 K. Illuminance was controlled in a stepwise manner using a manual dimmer.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Eight Japanese male and eight Japanese female subjects participated.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
LED lights, spectroradiometer (HSR-8100; Maki Manufacturing Co.), luminance meter (Illuminance meter 510–05, Yokogawa Meters & Instruments Co.), and EEG and ECG monitoring equipment.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Subjects were exposed to light in a stepwise manner, indicating their perception of brightness, glare, and comfort at controlled illuminance levels. ECG and EEG data were continuously monitored.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Boundary illuminances were identified based on changes in psychological and physiological responses, including HRV and EEG analysis.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容