研究目的
To compare the short-term effects of pulsed laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and functional disability in women with chronic non-specific low back pain.
研究成果
The pulsed low-power laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound have significant short-term effects when it comes to reducing pain and improving functional disability in woman patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. However, in terms of the improvement in functional disability and when compared the groups, the PUSG showed superior results to the LG, CUSG and CG.
研究不足
No follow-up was carried out and the results are only in the short term. Lack of a placebo group. Complementary examinations such as image were also limiting factor in the diagnosis of low back pain not specific.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
A single blind randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of pulsed laser, pulsed ultrasound, and continuous ultrasound on chronic non-specific low back pain.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
100 women with chronic non-specific low back pain were randomly allocated into four groups.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Pulsed laser (904 nm, 3 J/cm2), pulsed ultrasound (3 MHz, 1 W/cm2), continuous ultrasound (1 MHz, 1 W/cm2).
4:2). Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
4. Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow: Treatments were applied three times per week for 10 sessions. Pain and functional disability were assessed before and after treatment.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon’s non-parametric test, Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance, and post hoc Dunn’s test.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容