研究目的
To assess the performance of NIRS in predicting the forage quality parameters of five warm-season legumes using three machine learning techniques: partial least square (PLS), support vector machine (SVM), and Gaussian processes (GP). Additionally, the efficacy of global models in predicting forage quality was investigated.
研究成果
The study demonstrated that NIRS techniques could be effective for supplying rapid and accurate predictions of most attributes of forage quality for different warm-season legumes. The SVM technique performed consistently well in predicting quality parameters under both species-based and global calibration strategies. The global calibration approach can be a useful approach for predicting CP in warm-season legumes, reducing the time and resources required for traditional chemical analysis.
研究不足
The global model for IVTD was not accurate for all species, indicating variability in prediction accuracy across different legumes. Further model development based on other analytical procedures may improve the consistency and reliability of the global approach.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study involved the use of NIRS coupled with machine learning techniques (PLS, SVM, GP) to predict forage quality parameters of five warm-season legumes.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
A set of 70 forage samples was used to develop species-based models for concentrations of crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and in vitro true digestibility (IVTD) of guar and tepary bean forages, and CP and IVTD in pigeon pea and soybean.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Near infrared spectrophotometer (Model SpectraStar 2600 XT-R, Unity Scientific, Columbia, MD, USA), Weka software, version
4:8 for machine learning algorithms. Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Forage samples were collected, dried, ground, and scanned using NIRS. Spectral data were analyzed using machine learning techniques.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
The performance of the calibration techniques was evaluated using coefficients of determination (R2) and root mean squared error (RMSE) in calibration, cross-validation, and external validation.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容