研究目的
To compare the serrated polyp detection rate of NBI versus HD-WLE in a randomized, cross-over trial of tandem colonoscopy in patients with prior serrated lesions not fulfilling SPS criteria.
研究成果
In patients with previously resected relevant serrated lesions, there were no differences in the use of NBI or HD-WLE in the detection of serrated lesions, with the two techniques having a similar polyp miss rate. A shorter reassessment colonoscopy interval would be suitable in these patients.
研究不足
Single-center study with a small number of patients. Back-to-back colonoscopies performed by the same endoscopist. Study not designed to evaluate the accuracy of the endoscopists in characterizing detected lesions.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
Randomized, cross-over trial comparing NBI and HD-WLE in detecting serrated lesions.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Consecutive patients with prior detection of at least one serrated polyp ≥10 mm or ≥ 3 serrated polyps larger than 5 mm, both proximal to the sigmoid colon.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
High-definition colonoscopes (EVIS EXERA III CV-190; Olympus Inc., Tokyo, Japan).
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Same-day tandem colonoscopies performed by five experienced endoscopists, with the order randomized 1:1 to NBI—HD-WLE or HD-WLE—NBI.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Statistical analyses performed using STATA/IC software (version 13.1. StataCorp Lp, College Station, TX, United States).
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容