研究目的
To compare the safety, efficacy, tolerability, and ability to induce collagen and elastin remodeling of non-ablative fractional laser (NAFXL) versus ablative fractional laser (AFXL) in a series of treatments over time.
研究成果
NAFXL is as effective and safe as the traditional AFXL, with better tolerability and shorter downtime. MPT-based optical skin biopsies are useful for assessing collagen and elastin remodeling.
研究不足
The study is limited by its single-case design and the lack of quantitative autofluorescence signal data for collagen and elastin induction.
1：Experimental Design and Method Selection:
Prospective, proof of principle, single-case study comparing NAFXL and AFXL treatments.
2：Sample Selection and Data Sources:
A 50-years old male with Fitzpatrick skin type II.
3：List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
NAFXL Er:Glass 1,540 nm laser and AFXL 10,600 nm CO2 laser.
4：Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Laser treatments applied in a series of parallel treatments over time.
5：Data Analysis Methods:
Histopathology, clinical evaluations, and optical biopsies using multiphoton tomography (MPT).
独家科研数据包，助您复现前沿成果，加速创新突破
获取完整内容
