研究目的
To compare the efficacy and safety of fractional Er:YAG laser with microneedling in facial rejuvenation.
研究成果
Both fractional Er:YAG laser and microneedling are effective and safe modalities in skin rejuvenation, with microneedling offering less pain and shorter downtime, making it a preferable option for many patients.
研究不足
The study did not perform a skin biopsy 6 months after the procedures to assess the histopathological pattern of possible neocollagenesis due to participants' unwillingness.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study was a split-face clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of fractional Er:YAG laser and microneedling in facial rejuvenation. Volunteers received three monthly treatments on each side of the face, one with fractional Er:YAG laser and one with microneedling.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
32 volunteers with mild-to-moderate wrinkles were selected, with 24 completing the study.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Fractional Er:YAG laser (LOTUS II; Laseroptek Co., Ltd.), microneedling device (Dermapen; 3MED Group), local anesthetic cream (lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% cream), Multi-Probe Adaptor System (MPA 9; Courage & Khazaka Electronic GmbH) for assessing skin biomechanical properties.
4:5% and prilocaine 5% cream), Multi-Probe Adaptor System (MPA 9; Courage & Khazaka Electronic GmbH) for assessing skin biomechanical properties. Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
4. Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow: Treatments were performed monthly, with assessments at baseline, 1 month after each treatment, and 3 months after the last treatment.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Descriptive analysis, Chi-square test, t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, one-way ANOVA, Fisher's exact test, Friedman test, and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容