研究目的
To describe a reproducible and open-source methodology for estimating leaf area density (LAD) from airborne LiDAR and compare LAD estimates from two airborne LiDAR systems, NEON AOP and NASA G-LiHT, which differ in survey and instrument specifications, collections goals, and laser pulse densities.
研究成果
The study concludes that LAD estimates from airborne LiDAR can be used to describe the three-dimensional structure of forests across entire landscapes. This information can help inform forest management and conservation decisions related to the estimation of aboveground biomass and productivity, the response of forests to large-scale disturbances, the impacts of drought on forest health, the conservation of bird habitat, as well as a host of other important forest processes and responses.
研究不足
The study acknowledges that the lack of ground returns can severely limit the spatial coverage of LAD estimates across the landscape, which can result in missing data within the study area. Additionally, the study notes that the distribution of clusters of leaves, stems, and branches, the spatial structure of gaps in the forest, and the disturbance histories of a landscape may influence the error and bias of forest structural estimates depending on the sampling scale used.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection
The study used the R programming language for estimating LAD from airborne LiDAR. The methodology is based on the method established by MacArthur and Horn (1969) and similar to other published methods.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources
Field measurements and LiDAR data were acquired at the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center (SERC), approximately 16 km south of Annapolis, Maryland, USA.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials
Hemispherical photographs were collected using a Canon EOS Rebel T6 camera with an 8 mm circular fish-eye lens (180-degree angle of view). LiDAR data were collected using a Riegl VQ-480i LiDAR sensor for NASA G-LiHT and an ALTM Gemini LiDAR sensor for NEON AOP.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow
The study compared LAD estimates from two airborne LiDAR systems, NEON AOP and NASA G-LiHT, which differ in survey and instrument specifications, collections goals, and laser pulse densities. The impacts of the spatial scale of analysis as well as differences in canopy penetration and pulse density on LAD and LAI estimates were addressed.
5:Data Analysis Methods
LAD was estimated from voxelized LiDAR data using an approach based on the method established by MacArthur and Horn (1969). The study also calculated Beer-Lambert coefficients for each LiDAR sensor at each spatial resolution based on relationships with hemispherical photographs.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容