研究目的
To develop a mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) based workflow for extracting m/z values related to putative protein biomarkers and using these for reliable tumor classification.
研究成果
The study demonstrated that classification models based on extracted features related to target proteins are more robust and less sensitive to technical variation compared to conventional feature extraction methods. This supports the hypothesis that the selected features are closely related to the true proteomic profiles of the tumor types, enabling more reliable tumor classification.
研究不足
The study acknowledges technical variability and measurement artifacts in MALDI MSI data that may confound classification models. The feature extraction process involved subjective judgment in selecting proteins with consistent discrimination patterns, suggesting the need for further automation. Additionally, the study used primary tumors rather than metastases, indicating a direction for future research.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study involved extracting m/z values related to putative protein biomarkers from heterogeneous MSI datasets derived from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue material. A linear discriminant analysis classification model was trained to discriminate between breast and ovarian cancer types based on these features.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Tumor tissue samples from patients with breast (N = 106) and ovarian carcinoma (N = 135) were used. The samples were prepared and acquired in two different laboratories using different protocols.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
MALDI MSI data were collected using autoflex speed and rapifleX Tissuetyper mass spectrometers (Bruker). Tissue preparation involved the use of ImagePrep device (Bruker Daltonik) or TM Sprayer (HTX Technologies).
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
The workflow included baseline correction, data normalization, spatial denoising, and resampling to intervals of
5:4 Da width. Feature extraction was performed using ROC, CSP, and TP methods. Data Analysis Methods:
Classification was performed using the LDA algorithm, and model validation was conducted using cross-validation schemes to assess generalization performance.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容