研究目的
Investigating the use of RC4 algorithm for ensuring burst confidentiality in optical burst switching networks compared to the existing AES algorithm.
研究成果
The RC4 algorithm provides better results than the AES algorithm for burst encryption and decryption in OBS networks, offering less encryption and decryption time and consequently less end-to-end delay.
研究不足
The study is limited to simulation scenarios and does not address physical implementation challenges or real-world network conditions.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study employs RC4 and AES algorithms for burst encryption and decryption in OBS networks. The performance is compared based on encryption and decryption time, and end-to-end delay.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Simulations are conducted with burst sizes varying from 40,000 to 80,000 packets/burst, connected via 1Gbps and 20Gbps links.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Hardware specifications include a 2.99GHz CPU and 2GB RAM.
4:99GHz CPU and 2GB RAM.
Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
4. Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow: The simulation scenario involves client networks connected to an OBS ingress node, aggregating packets into bursts, and then encrypting and decrypting these bursts using RC4 and AES algorithms.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
The performance comparison is based on the encryption and decryption time, and end-to-end delay for various burst sizes.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容