研究目的
To investigate the use of ES when revealing the worst case effects of the crosstalk propagation in PCB bus of spacecraft ANS and compare its results with the GA results.
研究成果
The study demonstrated the effectiveness of GA and ES in optimizing ultrashort pulse duration to reveal and localize crosstalk maximums in a PCB bus. The GA provided higher crosstalk maximum amplitudes compared to ES, suggesting its better suitability for this specific problem.
研究不足
The study focused on a specific PCB bus structure and may not generalize to all PCB designs. The optimization was limited to the parameters of the GA and ES used.
1：Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study used GA and ES for optimizing the duration of an ultrashort pulse to maximize crosstalk amplitude in a PCB bus.
2：Sample Selection and Data Sources:
The ANS PCB bus was the structure under investigation, modeled with specific parameters.
3：List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
The study utilized TALGAT software for simulation and barecmaes
4：py module for optimization implementation. Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
The ES was run 20 times with an initial solution of 300 ps, and the GA was run 10 times with varying parameters.
5：Data Analysis Methods:
The results of both optimization methods were compared based on the maximum crosstalk amplitude achieved.
独家科研数据包，助您复现前沿成果，加速创新突破
获取完整内容
