研究目的
To compare block-based stereo and semi-global algorithms for calculating tree disparity maps and investigate the effects of ISO speed, exposure time, metering mode, and image pre-processing on the disparity map.
研究成果
The semi-global algorithm outperformed the block-based stereo algorithm. Optimal results were achieved with default window size and real maximum disparity values. Image rectification is crucial for accurate disparity values, while un-distortion had minimal effect. Imaging parameters (ISO speed, exposure time, metering mode) significantly impact disparity maps, with best results obtained when parameters are set to low values, pattern mode, and are consistent between left and right images.
研究不足
The study used an artificial tree, which may not fully represent real trees. The controlled environment might not capture all outdoor lighting variations. Only two algorithms and specific parameters were tested, limiting generalizability.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study compared block-based stereo and semi-global matching algorithms with 5 implementations each, using parameters like window size and maximum disparity. It also examined the effects of imaging parameters (ISO speed, exposure time, metering mode) and pre-processing steps (image un-distortion and rectification).
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
An artificial cherry tree (50x70 cm conical shape) was used, positioned in a controlled lighting room. 50 image pairs were acquired using two Canon A800 cameras with a fixed baseline of 12 cm, height, and distance of 110 cm from the tree.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Two Canon A800 cameras, a planar checkerboard (22x31 cm with 31 mm squares) for calibration, controlled lighting system, and MATLAB software for calibration and processing.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Images were captured under different conditions. Pre-processing included camera calibration using 20 checkerboard images per camera, image un-distortion, and rectification. Disparity maps were computed using the algorithms, and results were analyzed with morphological operations for correction.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Disparity maps were evaluated visually and through histograms to assess the effects of parameters. MATLAB tools were used for calibration and processing.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容