研究目的
To design a reliable blind image quality assessment (BIQA) method that considers degradations on both low-level and high-level features, inspired by the hierarchical processing in the human visual system, for accurate quality prediction consistent with subjective perception.
研究成果
The proposed HFD-BIQA method effectively models hierarchical feature degradations, achieving high consistency with subjective perception across multiple databases. It outperforms existing BIQA methods, demonstrating robustness and accuracy in blind image quality assessment, with potential for applications in image processing systems.
研究不足
The method relies on pre-trained networks and may be limited by the size and diversity of available image quality databases. Computational complexity could be high due to deep learning components, and generalization to unseen distortion types might require further validation.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study mimics the human visual system's hierarchical processing by designing an orientation selectivity-based local structure for low-level feature extraction and using a deep residual network (ResNet) for high-level semantics extraction. Features are fused into a hierarchical set, and support vector regression (SVR) is used to model the correlation with subjective quality scores.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Four image quality assessment databases are used: CSIQ (866 images), LIVE (779 images), TID2013 (3000 images), and Wild-LIVE (1163 images). Images include various distortions and noise levels.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Computational tools and software for image processing and machine learning, including LIBSVM for SVR and a pre-trained ResNet model.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Extract low-level features using the OS-based method, high-level features using ResNet, fuse features, normalize them, and use SVR to train and predict quality scores. Perform cross-validation with 80% training and 20% testing splits repeated 1000 times.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Evaluate performance using Spearman rank order correlation coefficient (SRCC), Pearson linear correlation coefficient (PLCC), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Statistical significance is assessed using f-test with 95% confidence level.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容