研究目的
To minimize the implementation cost (specifically the number of multiplications) of on-board beamforming in high throughput satellite systems while satisfying minimum signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio constraints and total power constraints.
研究成果
The proposed L1-minimization approach significantly reduces the implementation cost (number of multiplications) by up to 50% for lower spectral efficiencies with minimal extra power (e.g., 0.1 Watt for 2.20 bps), demonstrating its efficacy over traditional power minimization methods. This makes on-board beamforming more feasible for high throughput satellite systems by lowering processing burden.
研究不足
The study assumes no inter-feeder link interference and uses a simplified channel model with only rain attenuation. The convex relaxation (cid:96)1 norm may not always achieve the optimal sparsity of (cid:96)0 norm, and the approach is validated only through simulations for a specific 12-beam system, potentially limiting generalizability to other configurations.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study formulates the beamforming problem as a second-order cone programming problem using (cid:96)1 norm relaxation to minimize the number of non-zero coefficients in the beamforming matrix, which corresponds to reducing multiplications. This is compared with traditional power minimization methods (L2-norm).
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Monte Carlo simulations are conducted with 500 channel realizations based on user positions in beams, using parameters from the European Space Agency (ESA) for a 12-beam system covering Europe. Channel fading statistics correspond to the city of Rome.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Not explicitly mentioned; simulations are computational, likely using software tools like CVX for convex optimization.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Simulations involve varying spectral efficiencies (2.20, 2.5, 2.666, 3 bps) and transmit powers, with extra power supplements (0% to 1%) to assess implementation cost reduction. Performance is evaluated in terms of number of non-zero coefficients and extra power required.
5:20, 5, 666, 3 bps) and transmit powers, with extra power supplements (0% to 1%) to assess implementation cost reduction. Performance is evaluated in terms of number of non-zero coefficients and extra power required.
Data Analysis Methods:
5. Data Analysis Methods: Results are analyzed through plots comparing L1-minimization and L2-minimization in terms of implementation cost and power consumption, averaged over 500 realizations.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容