研究目的
To develop an improved top-hat filter with a sloped brim for accurately and effectively extracting ground points from airborne lidar point clouds, enhancing robustness for complex objects and terrains.
研究成果
The improved top-hat filter with a sloped brim effectively extracts ground points from lidar data, preserving abrupt terrain features and removing complex objects with minimal error oscillation. It shows stable performance across diverse environments and high computational efficiency. Future work should focus on adaptive tuning of parameters for further accuracy improvement.
研究不足
The filter may have commission errors for very low objects like flower beds and grasslands that do not fit the defined height difference and window size relations. It relies on empirical thresholds and window sizes, which may not adapt automatically to all landscapes, and performance can be affected by data gaps and complex object structures.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study uses an improved top-hat filter based on mathematical morphology, incorporating a sloped brim to handle complex terrains and objects. It involves top-hat transformation, elevation change intensity inspection, and brim filtering.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Benchmark datasets from ISPRS Commission III/WG3, including urban and rural samples with various features like buildings, vegetation, and steep slopes, and a practical dataset from Xianning, China, acquired with a Leica ALS50-II scanner.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Airborne lidar systems (Optech ALTM for ISPRS data, Leica ALS50-II for Xianning data), computers for processing (e.g., with Intel i3-2350 Processor), and software for implementation (e.g., Microsoft Visual C++
4:0 IDE). Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Steps include constructing a spatial index grid, removing low outliers, executing top-hat transformation with iterative window sizes and thresholds, applying brim filtering along rows and columns, and comparing results with other filters and commercial software.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Error analysis using type I (omission), type II (commission), and total errors; comparison with methods like TerraScan, Sohn, Axelsson, Pfeifer; and performance evaluation based on accuracy and computational efficiency.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容