研究目的
To evaluate the color rendering properties of the white LED confocal system and compare them to those of a conventional flash fundus camera through chromaticity analysis.
研究成果
The confocal white LED system, Eidon, produces more-balanced color images with a wider richness of color content compared to a conventional flash fundus camera. This may provide greater discriminative power and diagnostic accuracy, especially in conditions like diabetic retinopathy where retinal findings are reddish.
研究不足
The study did not assess the clinical impact of the differences in color rendering between the two devices on diagnostic accuracy. Future studies comparing the performance of human graders and artificial intelligence-based algorithms when using either device are warranted.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study compared the color rendering properties of a white LED confocal device (Eidon) and a traditional flash fundus camera (TRC-NW8) through chromaticity analysis.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Fundus images were captured from 233 eyes of 181 patients using both devices.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Eidon (Centervue, Padova, Italy) and TRC-NW8 (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) were used.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
One retinal image centered on the macula was captured for each eye by a trained technician using both devices. Images were analyzed as they were outputted from the devices without any processing.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Chromaticity analysis was performed according to the image color signature, defined as the distribution of its pixels in the rgb chromaticity space. Descriptors used for analysis included the average and variability of the barycenter positions, the average of the variability, and the number of unique colors (NUC) of all signatures.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容