研究目的
To compare the performance of two ensemble machine learning methods, AdaBoost and Random Forest, in predicting the output current of photovoltaic systems under varying environmental conditions.
研究成果
Random Forest demonstrated superior performance over AdaBoost in predicting PV system output current under varying environmental conditions, with lower mean and standard deviation of absolute error. Future work could explore the integration of these methods into MPPT algorithms.
研究不足
The study focuses on the comparison of two ensemble methods under specific conditions and does not explore the integration of these methods into real-time MPPT algorithms or their performance under all possible environmental variations.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study employs a single diode model adjusted for varying environmental conditions and uses an evolutionary algorithm to extract parameters reflecting the current state of PV modules.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
A dataset of fast varying environmental conditions is used, augmented with terminal current values based on the mathematical model.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Not explicitly mentioned.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
The mathematical model is tested under different irradiance and temperature levels, and the dataset is used to train and validate the AdaBoost and Random Forest models.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Performance is evaluated based on absolute error between the mathematical model predictions and those of the ensemble methods.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容