研究目的
To determine the effect of the orientation schemes of the energy collection element (ECE) on the optical performance of a parabolic trough concentrating collector (PTCC), including irradiance distribution and optical efficiency, using Monte Carlo ray tracing (MCRT) technique.
研究成果
The MCRT study shows that ECE orientation schemes with curved surfaces (circular, semicircular, RSc) have higher optical efficiencies (>79%) than linear surfaces (25-38%) under ideal conditions. Among linear surfaces, inverted triangular ECEs perform best. Defocus and tracking errors reduce optical efficiency but improve irradiance uniformity. Rectangular and RSc ECEs are more efficient in intercepting light during errors. The findings aid in designing optically efficient ECEs for PTCCs, with recommendations for future work on thermal performance and energy potential.
研究不足
The study assumes ideal conditions with no shading from support structures, no structural deformities, and negligible diffuse light. The model may overestimate optical efficiency due to simplifications and experimental errors. The glass envelope was not considered in some parts, and the focus was primarily on optical performance without detailed thermal or electrical analysis. The research is limited to specific ECE geometries and does not cover all possible designs or real-world environmental factors.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
A Monte Carlo ray tracing (MCRT) technique was applied to model and simulate the optical performance of various ECE orientation schemes (circular, semicircular, flat, triangular, inverted triangular, rectangular, and rectangle on semi-circle) for a PTCC. The study used Zemax? optical ray tracing software for simulations, with assumptions including uniform irradiance along the ECE axis, specular reflectance, no shading, no structural deformities, and negligible diffuse light.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
The Luz Solar II (LS2) collector was modeled for validation, with geometric and optical properties from published data. Test conditions from Dudley et al. (1994) were selected for comparison.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
The setup included a parabolic trough mirror, various ECE geometries, and optical properties such as reflectance, transmittance, and absorptance. Specific materials and equipment details are not explicitly listed beyond the LS2 collector parameters.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
The MCRT model was developed and validated against measured optical efficiencies and analytical flux profiles. Rays were traced (5×10^7 to 10^8 rays/m2) using coordinate systems (Cartesian and cylindrical), with light interactions modeled using Fresnel's and Snell's laws. Irradiance distribution and optical efficiency were calculated for each ECE scheme under different conditions (defocus, tracking error, rim angle).
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Local concentration ratio (LCR) profiles were analyzed to compute peak, base, mean concentrations, mean absolute deviation (MAD), and optical efficiency using statistical methods and equations provided in the paper.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容