研究目的
To evaluate the performance of neon pulsed glow discharge for the quantification of high ionisation energy elements, fluorine and oxygen, in KTP crystals, and to compare it with conventional argon glow discharge.
研究成果
Neon glow discharge significantly improves the sensitivity and detection limits for high ionisation energy elements like oxygen and fluorine in dielectric materials, with detection limits of 0.0005 mass % for oxygen and 0.0002 mass % for fluorine. However, it performs worse for other elements due to reduced sputtering rates. The method allows simultaneous quantification of all constituent elements in a single run, justifying the use of neon despite its higher cost.
研究不足
The use of neon results in lower sputtering rates for elements like potassium and phosphorus, leading to higher detection limits for these elements compared to argon. The method requires higher voltage and pressure for neon discharge, and neon is more expensive than argon. Potential interferences from charge transfer processes and spectral overlaps were noted but mitigated.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study used pulsed glow discharge time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GD MS) with neon as the discharge gas, optimized for parameters like repelling pulse delay, discharge duration, voltage, and pressure. Relative sensitivity factors (RSFs) were employed for quantification, with titanium as the normalizing element.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Fluorine-doped potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) single crystals and calibration samples (C1-C9) made from aluminum powder, titanium oxide, lanthanum fluoride, and KH2PO4 were used. Geological reference material SGD-1A was also analyzed for validation.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Equipment included a Lumas-30 time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Lumex, St. Petersburg, Russia), a combined hollow cathode (CHC) with a tantalum auxiliary cathode, high purity neon and argon gases (LindeGaz Rus), a manual hydraulic press PRG-400 (Rost, Moscow, Russia), and a scanning electron microscope Zeiss Merlin (Carl Zeiss AG) with an EDX detector INCAx-act (Oxford Instruments). Materials included calibration samples, KTP crystals, and reference materials.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Samples were prepared by grinding, pressing into tablets, and heating to reduce interferences. They were placed in the discharge chamber, purged with neon, and analyzed using optimized GD MS parameters. Signal intensities were integrated, and RSFs were determined from calibration curves.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Data were analyzed using statistical methods, including calculation of mean values, confidence intervals, relative standard deviations, and limits of detection based on background intensity and signal ratios.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容