研究目的
To develop a machine learning system with high computational speed and good accuracy for recognizing spray and non-spray areas for UAV-based sprayers in agricultural croplands and orchards.
研究成果
The developed machine learning system using MSM achieved an average recognition accuracy of 70% for distinguishing spray and non-spray areas from UAV images, with minimal computational time (0.0031 s), making it suitable for real-time autonomous UAV spray applications. Future work should incorporate artificial neural networks and deep learning for enhanced performance.
研究不足
The classifiers were trained and tested on datasets acquired in late fall season, limiting generalizability. MSM may have reduced accuracy in complex canopy systems or under varying lighting conditions. The system requires further training with larger datasets and different conditions to improve accuracy.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The research used the mutual subspace method (MSM) for pattern recognition from image sets, involving offline and online recognition systems. PCA was applied to establish linear subspaces for classification.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Images were collected using a UAV (DJI Phantom 3 Pro) from three field locations (L1, L2, L3) with croplands (carrot, cabbage, onion) and orchards (chestnut, persimmon, trees/structures) at heights of 5m and 15m, respectively. Training and testing datasets were split into halves for offline evaluation, and new video streams were used for online testing.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
DJI Phantom 3 Pro UAV with 4K camera (1/2.3" CMOS, FOV 94° 20mm f/2.8 lens), MATLAB 2015a software for data processing and interface development.
4:3" CMOS, FOV 94° 20mm f/8 lens), MATLAB 2015a software for data processing and interface development.
Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
4. Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow: Videos were converted to images, preprocessed (noise reduction, grayscale conversion, resizing to 8x8 pixels), and analyzed using MSM. For offline recognition, training used the first half of images, testing used the last half. For online recognition, a sliding window selected four consecutive frames from new video streams for real-time processing.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Accuracy was calculated based on true positive and true negative rates. Computational time was measured for classifier recognition.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容