研究目的
To investigate the crystallization kinetics of lithium aluminosilicate glass powder using model-free and model-fitting methods to determine kinetic parameters and understand the crystallization mechanism.
研究成果
Model-free methods provide reliable activation energy values (400-470 kJ/mol) with slight decreases during crystallization. Avrami-Erofeev model is suitable for describing crystallization, with bulk crystallization predominant. Theoretical DSC curves based on model-free parameters show good agreement with experimental data, confirming the utility of these methods for kinetic analysis.
研究不足
The study assumes certain approximations in kinetic models; the complexity of crystallization mechanisms may not be fully captured by single models. Variations in activation energy and Avrami coefficient indicate potential uncertainties in model selection.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
Non-isothermal experiments were conducted using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to monitor crystallization behavior. Model-free methods (OFW, KAS, FR) and model-fitting methods (e.g., Coats-Redfern) were employed to analyze kinetics.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
A glass composition of
3:2Li2O-6SiO2-49Al2O3-3TiO2-4BaO-97ZnO (mol%) was prepared from raw materials including lithium carbonate, silica, alumina, rutile, zinc oxide, and barium carbonate. Glass frit was melted at 1570°C, quenched, and milled to a mean particle size of 5μm. List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
DSC equipment (NETZSCH DSC 404C), planetary mill (Retsch pm400), zirconia media and balls (3 mm diameter), raw materials from various suppliers.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
For DSC analysis, 40mg powder was used with heating rates of 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20°C/min up to 900°C, repeated three times per rate. Data were normalized, and Thermokinetics
5:1 software was used for calculations. Data Analysis Methods:
Activation energy and Avrami coefficient were calculated using isoconversional methods and model-fitting approaches; theoretical DSC curves were compared with experimental data.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容