研究目的
To review the use of pulse oximetry for newborn screening of critical congenital heart defects, assess its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in Korea, and provide recommendations based on international practices.
研究成果
Pulse oximetry screening can reduce diagnostic delays for critical congenital heart defects and lower mortality rates, but it is not perfect due to its limitations. Implementation in Korea requires further study on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and education for caregivers on symptoms is essential even after a negative screen.
研究不足
The screening test has low sensitivity and a high false positive rate; it may not detect all critical congenital heart defects, especially non-hypoxemic types like coarctation of the aorta. Human error in following protocols can reduce effectiveness. The medical system and disease prevalence vary by country, limiting generalizability. In neonatal intensive care units, oxygen therapy can interfere with screening accuracy.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The paper is a review article, not an experimental study, so it does not describe a specific experimental design or methodology. It synthesizes existing literature and studies on pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
The review includes data from various studies, such as meta-analyses and large-scale prospective studies from countries like the US, Sweden, Germany, Norway, and the UK, involving over 123,846 newborns in some analyses.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Pulse oximeters are mentioned, but no specific models or brands are detailed in the paper.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Describes the general protocol for pulse oximetry screening, including timing (24-48 hours after birth), measurement sites (right hand and one foot), and criteria for positive/negative results (e.g., SpO2 <90% or difference >3%).
5:Data Analysis Methods:
The review discusses statistical measures from studies, such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, derived from meta-analyses and systematic reviews.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容