研究目的
To compare the effectiveness of water jet guided laser technique and traditional laser beam machining in cutting CFRP, focusing on reducing thermal damage and improving surface integrity.
研究成果
WJGL significantly reduces thermal damage in CFRP cutting compared to LBM, with no obvious deterioration in the matrix on the cutting surface. However, its effective cutting velocity is much slower, and it requires multi-passes to cut through the material. Increasing the power density of WJGL could address these drawbacks.
研究不足
The efficiency of WJGL is significantly lower than LBM, and multi-passes are required to achieve a complete cut for the sample thickness. The low power density and strong convection cooling effect of WJGL contribute to its low efficiency.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
A comparative study between water jet guided laser machining (WJGL) and traditional laser beam machining (LBM) was conducted using the same laser source.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
An epoxy-based CFRP with 5-layers and a total thickness of 1 mm was used.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
The laser source used is AWAVE UV series, a galvanometer scanner with a focal length of 100 mm for LBM, and a self-devised experimental setup for WJGL including a water cycling system and coupling unit.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Processing parameters were optimized for both methods to achieve better surface integrity.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
The kerf geometry, HAZ, surface morphology, and efficiency were analyzed and compared.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容