研究目的
Evaluating the clinical effectiveness and safety of the picosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser using a microlens array compared with the quasi-long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of photoaging facial wrinkles and pores in Asians.
研究成果
The picosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser with a microlens array is as effective as the quasi-long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of photoaging wrinkles and pores.
研究不足
The study was confined to one ethnicity without heterogeneity in Fitzpatrick skin types and the small sample size.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
A split-faced, prospective study was designed to compare the effectiveness of two laser treatments.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
25 subjects with photoaging facial wrinkles and enlarged pores were enrolled.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Picosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser (PicocareTM, WONTECH Co., Ltd, Daejeon, Korea) and the quasi-long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser (Excel VTM, CUTERA, Inc., Brisbane, CA, USA).
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Each facial area was randomly assigned to undergo treatment with either laser. Five laser sessions were performed at 2-week intervals.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Clinical response was assessed using a five-point global assessment scale, wrinkle and pore index derived from 3D camera analysis.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容