研究目的
To compare the effect of an air plasma device and diode laser in dogs undergoing palatoplasty, focusing on intra-operative and immediate post-operative complications and evaluation of thermal injury in histological tissue sections of the excised soft palate.
研究成果
The air-plasma device was a viable surgical option for palatoplasty in dogs with BOAS, with no significant differences in thermal injury compared to the diode laser. Further clinical studies are encouraged to validate these preliminary results.
研究不足
Small sample size may lead to type 2 errors. Post-operative complications were indirectly detected, potentially underestimating slight local bleeding and/or edema.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
Prospective study comparing two surgical devices for palatoplasty in dogs with BOAS.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Twenty dogs with enlarged soft palates, divided into two groups for treatment with either an air plasma device or diode laser.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Air plasma device (Onemythis, Otech Industry) and diode laser (Diode Laser, Quanta System).
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Dogs underwent palatoplasty with either device, followed by histopathological analysis of the excised soft palate.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Statistical analysis of surgical times, complications, and histological evaluation of thermal injury.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容