研究目的
Investigating the potential of urinary volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as novel non-invasive diagnostic biomarker for diabetes and the influence of sample age on the diagnostic accuracy of urinary VOCs.
研究成果
FAIMS and FOX 4000 eNoses can discriminate DM2 from controls using urinary VOCs. In addition, urine sample age affects discriminative accuracy.
研究不足
The study suggests that the optimal timing for urine analysis is less than 12 months and certainly not beyond this sample age.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study used FAIMS and FOX4000 eNose instruments to analyze urinary VOCs for diagnosing diabetes. Four different classifiers (Sparse Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gaussian Process, and Support Vector) were used for classification.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
140 urine samples (73 DM2, 67 healthy) were collected at UHCW NHS Trust clinics over 4 years and stored at ?80 ?C within two hours of collection.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
FAIMS (Lonestar instrument, Owlstone, Cambridge, UK) and FOX 4000 (Alpha M.O.S, Toulouse, France) were used.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Urine samples were thawed to 4 ?C in a laboratory fridge for 24 h prior to testing. For FAIMS, 5 mL of urine were aliquoted into a 10 mL glass vial and placed into an ATLAS sample system. For FOX4000, samples were agitated and heated to 40 ?C for 10 min before 2.5 ml of the sample headspace was injected into the electronic nose.
5:5 ml of the sample headspace was injected into the electronic nose.
Data Analysis Methods:
5. Data Analysis Methods: PCA and four different classifiers were used for data analysis.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容