研究目的
This work presents a comparative study of two types of SPD-deposited layer structures, based on TiO2-CZTS and ZnO-CZTS heterojunctions with the aim of identifying the best electrical response and the possible bottlenecks.
研究成果
Spray deposited CZTS-TiO2 and CZTS-ZnO hetero-junctions were obtained. The choice of the n-type layer affects the morphology of the heterostructure both at the surface as well as at the interface, with consequences on the charge transport. Although the TiO2-CZTS interface seems more continuous than the ZnO-CZTS one, the latter shows a slightly better fill factor. This can be the consequence of additional non-stoichiometric phases in the CZTS layer that may affect the bands alignment between the n and p types of semiconductors.
研究不足
The efficiency values are lower than 0.01% in both cases, as a possible result of the multiple phases in the CZTS layer, but also of the imperfect interface between the two semiconducting thin films.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The thin films were deposited on commercial FTO covered glass by the spray pyrolysis deposition technique. The TiO2 layer was deposited using ethanol solution of TiCl4 (
2:05M), at 350oC, using 20 spraying sequences with 60 seconds break between them, followed by annealing at 500oC for 1hour to increase crystallinity. The ZnO layer was obtained using ZnCl2 in a 30% water-70% ethanol solution, using similar deposition and annealing conditions to those employed for the TiO2 layer. The Cu2ZnSnS4 layer was obtained from cationic chlorides and thiourea mixed in a water-ethanol solution (
1) to give an atomic ratio of 2:1:1:
3:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
The samples’ crystallinity was studied by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) using a Bruker Advanced D8 Discover Diffractometer with locked coupled continuous scan, 2s/step and CuKα1 radiation (
4:5406?), while Raman analysis (LabRAM HR800 Horiba) was used to confirm the CZTS formation. The surface morphology was investigated using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, Hitachi model S-3400N) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM, NT-MDT), in semicontact mode, after the deposition and annealing of the CZTS layer. The bandgap energy of the component layers was obtained using the Tauc formula from reflectance and transmittance spectra recorded using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer Lambda 25UV/Vis), in the 250–2500 nm range. List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
FTO covered glass (TEC 15/3mm Pilkington), TiCl4, ZnCl2, cationic chlorides, thiourea, ethanol, water.
5:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
The layers were deposited using spray pyrolysis deposition technique followed by annealing. The samples were characterized using XRD, Raman spectroscopy, SEM, AFM, and UV-Vis spectrophotometry.
6:Data Analysis Methods:
The crystallite sizes were calculated using Scherrer’s formula. The bandgap energy was obtained using the Tauc formula. The fill factor was calculated from the J-V curves.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容