研究目的
Investigating the interactions between supported cationic surfactant bilayers and the effect of different halide salts on these interactions using colloidal probe atomic force spectroscopy.
研究成果
The research demonstrates that electrolyte concentration and halide ion identity significantly affect the interactions between supported cationic bilayers, with larger halide ions (e.g., iodide) being more effective at reducing surface potential and inducing structural changes. The findings align with aspects of DLVO theory but highlight the role of hydration and ion-specific effects, suggesting the need for advanced models like the ionic binding model to fully describe these interactions. Future work could explore free vesicle systems and additional electrolyte types.
研究不足
The study is limited to supported bilayers, which may not fully capture effects from membrane bending and fluctuations present in free vesicles. Impurities in deionized water could affect low concentration measurements. The spring constant of colloidal probes could not be directly measured, introducing potential errors. The model assumes symmetrical systems and constant surface potential, which may not hold in all cases. Ion-specific effects are not fully accounted for in standard DLVO theory.
1：Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study used colloidal probe atomic force spectroscopy to measure forces between supported cationic bilayers. Bilayers were fabricated using the vesicle fusion technique on mica substrates. The experimental design involved varying electrolyte concentrations and compositions (NaCl, NaBr, NaI, CaCl2) to observe their effects on bilayer interactions, with comparisons to DLVO theory.
2：Sample Selection and Data Sources:
The cationic surfactant DIPEDMAMS was provided by Procter and Gamble, synthesized from a fatty acid mixture (C16, C18, C18:1). Salts (NaCl, NaBr, NaI, CaCl2) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Solutions were prepared with deionized water filtered through an activated carbon filter.
3：1). Salts (NaCl, NaBr, NaI, CaCl2) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Solutions were prepared with deionized water filtered through an activated carbon filter.
List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
3. List of Experimental Equipment and Materials: Atomic force microscope (JPK Nano wizard 4 AFM), colloidal probes (CP-PNP-BSG from Windsor Scientific, with 20 μm borosilicate glass spheres on cantilevers of 0.32 N/m spring constant), imaging probes (PNP-TR from Windsor Scientific), ultrasonic bath for sonication, UV/ozone plasma cleaner, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) equipment at Diamond Light Source beamline B
4：32 N/m spring constant), imaging probes (PNP-TR from Windsor Scientific), ultrasonic bath for sonication, UV/ozone plasma cleaner, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) equipment at Diamond Light Source beamline BExperimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
21.
4. Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow: Bilayers were formed by depositing vesicle dispersions on mica, equilibrating for 40 minutes, and flushing with water. Force measurements were conducted in an 8x8 grid with approach/withdrawal velocity of 1 μm/s. Electrolyte environments were changed by flushing with salt solutions and equilibrating for 10 minutes. AFM imaging was done in quantitative imaging mode. SAXS was performed at fixed detector distance and energy.
5：Data Analysis Methods:
Data were analyzed using JPK data processing software. DLVO theory was applied with Debye length and surface potential as fitting parameters. Statistical analysis included averaging across multiple force curves and comparing to theoretical models.
独家科研数据包，助您复现前沿成果，加速创新突破
获取完整内容
