研究目的
Investigating the effect of chelating agents (citrate and EDTA) on the visible light photocatalytic activity of natural pyrite for the inactivation of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922.
研究成果
Chelating agents enhance the photocatalytic inactivation of E. coli by natural pyrite under visible light, with citrate being more effective than EDTA. Optimal conditions include a chelating agent concentration of 0.5 mM, and increases in light intensity, H2O2, and aeration improve inactivation. Bulk hydroxyl radicals are the primary reactive species. ANN models effectively predict the process, supporting future applications in water disinfection.
研究不足
The study is limited to E. coli inactivation and may not generalize to other bacteria. The use of chelating agents could have environmental implications, and the scalability of the process for water treatment needs further investigation. The ANN models require experimental data for training and may not extrapolate well beyond tested conditions.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study evaluated the photocatalytic inactivation of E. coli using natural pyrite with citrate and EDTA as chelating agents under visible light irradiation. Kinetic models (Chick-Watson, log-linear with shoulder, Weibull) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) were employed to model the process.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
E. coli ATCC 25922 was used, cultured in trypticase soy broth and suspended in phosphate-buffered saline. Natural pyrite was purified and characterized.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Equipment included a photocatalytic reactor with LED lamps (400-600 nm, intensity 10-60 mW/cm2), sonicator (BANDELIN electronic, Germany), centrifuge, spectrophotometer (DR6000, HACH, Germany), atomic absorption spectroscopy (GBC System 5000, Australia), SEM (PHILIPS, S360, Mv2300), XRD (Quanta chrome, NOVA 2000), FTIR (FTS-165, BIO-RAD, USA). Materials included natural pyrite, citric acid monohydrate, EDTA, hydrogen peroxide, tert-butanol, Cr(VI), KI, and others from Merck.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Suspensions with pyrite and chelating agents were sonicated, irradiated with visible light, and samples were collected at intervals for bacterial count via spread plating on nutrient agar. Parameters like chelating agent concentration, light intensity, H2O2 addition, and aeration rate were varied. Scavenger tests were conducted to identify reactive species.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Kinetic parameters (kobs, Sl, 4D, δ1) were determined using GInaFIT software. ANNs with back-propagation and Levenberg-Marquardt algorithms were used for modeling, with performance indexes (R2, RMSE, MAE, AAD) calculated.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容