研究目的
To evaluate the effect of different machining parameters on the dimensional and microstructural quality of microholes obtained by electroerosion and laser drilling techniques in Inconel 718.
研究成果
The study concludes that laser trepan micro-drilling offers higher productivity but results in a greater concentration of cracks in the HAZ compared to electroerosion. The choice between the two techniques depends on the project requirements, with laser drilling being preferable for productivity and electroerosion for minimizing aggressiveness on the base metal.
研究不足
The study is limited to the evaluation of microholes in Inconel 718 using specific parameters for electroerosion and laser drilling. The comparison is based on productivity, dimensional control, and surface quality, but other factors like cost and equipment availability are not considered.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
A central composite statistical design was used to evaluate the influence of input parameter variations in both electroerosion and laser drilling processes.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Inconel 718 samples of 30 mm width, 160 mm length, and
3:47 mm thickness were used. List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
ZNC drilling EDM fast hole drilling equipment for electroerosion and Lasag KLS 246 for laser micro-drilling. Electrode materials were copper and brass for electroerosion.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Microholes were produced through fast hole drilling electroerosion and Nd:YAG laser micro-drilling by trepanation. Parameters varied according to the central composite design.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Material removal rates (MRR) were calculated, and diameter measurements were determined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. The software Design Expert 9.0 was used for mathematical modeling.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容