研究目的
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BBL on the appearance of facial pores.
研究成果
BBL seems to be a safe and mildly effective approach to reduce detectable pores.
研究不足
The small sample size (n = 25) and relatively brief follow-up time (2 months) are limitations. The study did not perform a subgroup analysis, and etiological confounding factors might explain the deviated results.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
A prospective randomized, split-face, self-controlled comparison study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of BBL for enlarged facial pore treatment by objective assessment.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
25 patients with enlarged facial pores were included. One split-face was treated by BBL, another split-face was untreated as a control.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
BBL (Profile system, Sciton, Inc, Palo Alto, CA), VISIA-CR imaging system (Canfield Scientific Inc, Fairfield, NJ), Elastimeter, Vapometer, Sebumscale, Moisturemeter (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio, Finland).
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Patients received five treatments with BBL at 2-week intervals. Objective measurements were taken pretreatment, at follow-up visits, and 2 months after the final treatment.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 and GraphPad Prism 7 to evaluate therapeutic outcomes.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容-
BBL
Profile system
Sciton, Inc
Nonablative, noninvasive skin tightening and rejuvenation
-
VISIA-CR imaging system
Canfield Scientific Inc
Accurately detect and measure photographic evidence of facial pores
-
Elastimeter
Delfin Technologies
Evaluate skin elasticity
-
Vapometer
Delfin Technologies
Evaluate transepidermal water loss
-
Sebumscale
Delfin Technologies
Evaluate skin sebum excretion
-
Moisturemeter
Delfin Technologies
Evaluate skin surface hydration values
-
登录查看剩余4件设备及参数对照表
查看全部