研究目的
to assess different policies to promote solar PV investment in the Colombian residential sector. The three policies—feed-in tariff, net metering, and capital subsidy—were analyzed using the criteria of efficiency and effectiveness.
研究成果
The most effective policy in terms of PV installed power capacity and avoided CO2 emissions is feed-in tariff, and in terms of efficiency, it is a moderate policy. Net metering is the most efficient policy but not the most effective. Capital subsidy leads to a higher PV installed capacity compared to feed-in tariff but is the least efficient policy. The best policy depends on the priorities of policy designers—those who give more importance to solar PV investments would prefer feed-in tariff, while designers who give priority to efficiency would prefer net metering.
研究不足
The study focuses on the Colombian residential sector and may not be directly applicable to other sectors or countries without adjustments. The simulation model's accuracy depends on the input data and assumptions made, such as the fixed percentage of capital subsidy and the average construction capacity per year.